Court upholds iGaming Ontario model, dismisses Kahnawà:ke…
Regulation · 2024-05-23

Court upholds iGaming Ontario model, dismisses Kahnawà:ke…

The Ontario Superior Court has dismissed the challenge filed by the Mohawk Council of Kahnawà:ke and ruled that the gaming model operated by iGaming Ontario is valid.

“We have always been confident in our model and are pleased that the court has ruled in our favour, and that Ontarians can continue to play with confidence in our regulated iGaming market,” said Executive Director of iGaming Ontario Martha Otton in an iGO statement. “Ontario’s model meets the requirements and contributes to the public good by protecting players, their data and their funds, while helping to fund priority public services in Ontario, and bringing well-paid, high-tech jobs and economic development to Ontario.”

iGaming Ontario has overseen online gaming and sports betting in Ontario since the province launched its regulated market on April 4, 2022.

The Superior Court’s ruling that iGO’s gaming model was valid was a direct response to a challenge lodged by Kahnawà:ke back in November 2022, seven months after the province launched regulated gaming, and heard from February of this year. The motion filed by the MCK argued that the provincial government’s “unilateral changes” to the way gaming is managed were “illegal and unconstitutional.”

The challenge hinged on the assertion that Ontario had re-interpreted Section 207 (1) of the Criminal Code, which permits provinces to regulate single-event sports betting, by allowing operators to “conduct and manage” themselves. Essentially, the MCK was asking the government to rule that it was the private-sector operators conducting and managing gaming offered in Ontario, not iGO.

The judgment noted there are issues with the phrase “conduct and manage” itself. Justice Lisa Brownstone wrote that she found the grammatical and ordinary sense of the terms “not particularly helpful to the interpretive task at hand” due to the vagaries of the ways the term can be defined.

Both parties had made their case.

The MCK said in its filing that “any reasonable interpretation” of the phrase “conduct and manage” would determine that Ontario leaves those duties up to the operators, who own their gaming websites, select their gaming offerings, decide how to advertise their products and services, and keep the lion’s share of the revenue. Meanwhile, iGO maintains that it conducts and manages iGaming, including controlling what games are allowed and how operators can operate, on behalf of the province via contracts with operators.

While the court ruled that Kahnawà:ke did have standing to challenge the province, it disagreed with the Council’s assertion. Justice Brownstone determined that the province has retained “key decision-making power” over the iGaming scheme and that operators in the Ontario market are not “their own masters.” Brownstone pointed to the fact that operators are not able to decide which games are eligible and are restricted in several avenues such as data usage, subcontracting, advertising, customer care, and responsible gaming.

On Monday, iGO said that “in dismissing the application brought forward by the Mohawk Council of Kahnawà:ke, the Superior Court found that iGaming Ontario is the ‘operating mind’ behind Ontario’s competitive iGaming market in accordance with the conduct and manage requirements of the Criminal Code.”

Kahnawà:ke had said its official legal challenge was a last resort after its attempts to engage in dialogue with government officials were repeatedly ignored.

The Council has been in the online gaming industry for 25 years, licensing online gaming operators on behalf of the Mohawks of Kahnawà:ke. It had been a vocal opponent of Bill C-218, the legislation that introduced single-event sports betting and ultimately led to Ontario’s regulated market opening up.

Kahnawà:ke said the bill “changed the iGaming/sports betting landscape to the detriment of Indigenous People” and that the subsequent framework for the market “disregards the expertise and the rights of First Nations to operate and regulate safe and responsible gaming.”

As a result of its opposition to Ontario’s new market, the MCK ceased the operations of its wholly owned subsidiary, Mohawk Online Limited, in the province.

Popular articles
UK MPs reopen 2025 gambling inquiry as reform stalls
Regulation
B2B Tech Infrastructure Gains Momentum in Philippine Gaming Sector
Southeast Asia
Online gambling, crypto pose ongoing money laundering risks in Philippines, analyst says
Southeast Asia
GAT CDMX 2025 Institutional Academy: Leaders and Experts Analyze the Present and Future of the Gaming Industry in Mexico and Lat
Sports Game
Institutional Academy that exceeded expectations marked the opening of GAT CDMX
Online Game
GGC Awards 2026 Shines in Colombo: Honoring Leaders and Innovators in the iGaming Industry
HUIDU Focus
1spin4win grows its Latin American presence by partnering with Fortuna Juegos
Online Game
Vietnam’s Controlled Gaming Shift Gains Ground, But Domestic Demand Still Lags
Southeast Asia
SBC Summit Canada to Make Player Safety a Key Pillar of 2026 Agenda
Marketing
Brazil Proposes Raising Gambling Tax Rate to 24%, With Revenue Allocated to Social Security and Healthcare
Regulation
PropellerAds Shared a New iGaming Case Study: 97,674 Installs and 12,701 Deposits in 3 Months
Marketing
Indiana online casino bill stalls in House committee
Regulation
GAT Expo Puerto Rico Will Pulse with the New Era of Gaming in the Caribbean
Marketing
Vietnam's tightening online gaming policy creates new market opportunities
Southeast Asia
Gaming & Technology Expo Makes a Powerful Entrance in CDMX
Marketing
Home
Game
Cooperation
Find
My