Ohio Bans Player-Specific Prop Bets For College Sports
· 2024-02-24

Ohio Bans Player-Specific Prop Bets For College Sports

Ohio Casino Control Commission Executive Director Matthew T. Schuler announced Friday that sports betting operators can no longer accept wagers on player-specific prop bets involving intercollegiate competitions.

The decision comes less than three weeks after NCAA Executive Director Charlie Baker sent a letter to the OCCC requesting the ban, citing three reasons for what he called “good cause” to eliminate those types of bets on college players. Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine supported Baker’s position, and Schuler agreed, saying “the good cause supports the NCAA’s request … because the NCAA’s request will safeguard the integrity of sports gaming and will be in the best interests of the public.”

The decision to ban player-specific prop bets on college games came despite written objections to Baker’s letter from eight licensed sportsbook operators in the state. The objections placed were mostly in general to a ban on player-specific prop bets for college games, with operators saying they had the ability to investigate their customers about bullying and harassment concerns and take “appropriate actions required by law.”

Operators also voiced concern about a potential ban driving people who want to make those type of bets toward illegal markets, but Schuler rejected that line of reasoning. He noted these type of wagers made up less than 1.4% of the handle and adjusted gross revenue in Ohio in 2023, and “yet these types of wagers most directly ‘attach an individual student-athlete’s name to a bet and therefore increase the likelihood of betting harassment being [directly] targeted toward them.'”

Operators have until March 1 to fully implement all restrictions and void all such existing wagers.

In explaining the “good cause” related to the NCAA’s request, Schuler pointed out college’s governing body had a specific aim with its request to ban player-specific prop bets: To “significantly limit the harassment, including threats, from occurring in the first place.” The NCAA provided information, according to Schuler, that showed such wagers were tied to player-specific harassment and the solution of a “decrease” in the availability of such wagers would lead to a decrease in harassment.

Another key factor in Schuler’s decision was that the NCAA provided information that was not countered by any party that a ban on player-specific prop bets would “improve student-athlete well-being, including their mental health (and) decrease the risk of insider information being solicited from college athletes or used to manipulate betting markets.”

Schuler found the NCAA’s argument to prevent harassment carried more merit than operators’ claims about investigating such incidents as they would come “after the harassment has occurred.” Schuler added that operator comments failed to “persuade me to disprove the NCAA’s request” and said there was low risk for a “perceived black market boom” when it came to player prop bets should they be made illegal.

In response to Baker’s letter, the OCCC asked operators to confidentially submit the current percentages of wager selections that would no longer be available if college prop bets were removed as well as the percentage of wager volume and handle amount of college prop bets from Jan. 1-Dec. 31, 2023 using the following criteria:

Any wager based on the following is NOT approved and is NOT permitted:
Any proposition or “prop” bet on an individual athlete’s performance or statistics
participating in a sporting event governed by the NCAA. Only proposition bets based
on full team statistical results are permitted.

It was determined there would be 2.2% fewer available wagering options overall, while less than 0.75% of all wagers made would not have been permitted. The average handle of the bets that would not have been permitted came to $4.75 million, while the total handle for such wagers totaled $104.6 million.

Ohio sportsbooks generated $7.67 billion handle — with nearly 97% of that from mobile betting apps — and $938 million in adjusted gross revenue in their first year of operation after launching on New Year’s Day 2023. The OCCC does not break out handle and revenue by sport category.

Legal sports betting is coming to NC! Use our DraftKings North Carolina Promo Code to get extras when you bet. 

熱門文章
GGC Awards 2026 璀璨科倫坡:致敬 iGaming 行業的領航者與創新力量
灰度頭條
越南在線博彩業政策收緊 催生市場新機遇
東南亞資訊
橫跨全球6個城市,灰度8場派對邀你共看世界盃,重塑高質量社交新場景
灰度頭條
JILI 宣佈與全球板球傳奇 AB de Villiers(ABD)達成重磅戰略合作
體育遊戲
哈薩克計劃對線上賭場促銷活動進行處罰
合規與政策
西班牙監管機構警告在線賭博平臺存在身份盜竊行為
合規與政策
菲律賓網絡賭博和加密貨幣仍構成持續的洗錢風險
東南亞資訊
灰度在iGB L!VE 2026展位T70和你相約7月,一起點燃倫敦的熱情!
灰度頭條
英國確認各垂直行業的賭博稅稅率
合規與政策
菲律賓博彩技術賽道迎來新變局,B2B 供應模式加速滲透
東南亞資訊
斯里蘭卡博弈產業大轉型,官方:劍指南亞拉斯維加斯
合規與政策
巴西擬將博弈稅率提高至24% 稅收將用於社保與醫療領域
合規與政策
越南博彩管控逐步放寬,惟本土需求仍顯乏力
東南亞資訊
印度最高法院受理公益訴訟,要求全國禁封「偽裝」成社交遊戲的賭博平台
合規與政策
印第安納州在線賭場法案在眾議院委員會停滯不前
合規與政策
首頁
遊戲
合作
發現
我的