Bulgaria’s Rejection of Gambling Act Amendments
· 2024-04-08

Bulgaria’s Rejection of Gambling Act Amendments

Bulgaria’s Rejection of Gambling Act Amendments

Share This Tags

At the end of 2023, Kostadin Kostadinov, leader of the Bulgarian nationalist party Revival (Bulgarian: ‘Vazrazhdane’), drafted a proposal to amend certain aspects of Bulgaria’s current Gambling Law. The proposal aimed to address concerns regarding gambling advertising and the protection of vulnerable individuals. However, the proposal faced challenges, with the relevant committees failing to consider it for further discussion.

The proposed amendments covered several key areas within the Gambling Law. One significant change focused on the overhaul of advertising rules to combat the perceived excessive presence of gambling advertisements, particularly on TV, radio, and other electronic media. Revival argued that these advertisements often reached minors and vulnerable individuals, contravening existing regulations.

Another proposed change aimed to optimize the efficiency of the national self-exclusion registry, a tool designed to help individuals with gambling problems exclude themselves from participating in gambling activities. Revival suggested a minimum time frame of two years before a player could remove themselves from the self-exclusion list, addressing concerns about the lack of centralization and the ease with which banned individuals could access other gambling venues.

Furthermore, Revival sought to increase the maximum payout for land-based wins from 5000 levs (£2.2k) to 10000 levs, promoting immediate access to winnings and discouraging repeated visits to banks for fund transfers. The party also advocated for changes to the licensing tax and gambling levy, proposing the elimination of licensing fees for gambling operators and replacing them with a 15% tax levy on all deposits made. This change aimed to align the tax structure with pre-2014 regulations and include land-based casinos, which were previously excluded.

Revival’s proposal was driven by concerns over the impact of gambling advertisements on vulnerable individuals and the need for a more effective self-exclusion system. Clement Shopov of Revival highlighted the industry’s use of advertisements not only to attract new customers but also to maintain the interest of those susceptible to gambling harm. Shopov argued that stricter advertising restrictions, similar to those in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Italy, should be implemented to protect vulnerable individuals.

Regarding changes to withdrawals, Shopov emphasized the importance of providing customers with instant access to their winnings at land-based casinos. This approach aimed to discourage customers from returning to casinos due to delays in fund transfers by banks. Additionally, Shopov proposed a shift from licensing fees to a tax levy on deposits, similar to the pre-2014 framework. The inclusion of land-based casinos in this tax structure revision was seen as a means to generate additional revenue for the treasury.

Media influence and conflict of interest were significant talking points during the plenary session. Dimo Drenchev, a member of Revival, criticized Bulgarian media companies for their heavy reliance on gambling advertisements, which accounted for 50% of their income. Drenchev described the media environment as “toxic” and argued that the media’s addiction to gambling companies compromised its objectivity.

These concerns were echoed by Sonya Momchilova, Chairwoman of Bulgaria’s Electronic Media Council (EMC), during a parliamentary hearing. Momchilova emphasized the need for stricter control over gambling ads, either through a blanket ban or specific time restrictions. She suggested that the responsibility for regulating gambling advertisements should lie with the National Revenue Agency (NRA) under the Gambling Act.

During the plenary session, a populist minority voted in favour of the proposed amendments, while the political majority chose to abstain. As a result, the amendments were rejected, and the proposed legislation did not move forward. However, with early elections anticipated in June, the future of Bulgaria’s gambling sector remains uncertain, as further developments and debates are expected.

熱門文章
JILI 宣佈與全球板球傳奇 AB de Villiers(ABD)達成重磅戰略合作
體育遊戲
英國確認各垂直行業的賭博稅稅率
合規與政策
灰度世界杯嘉年華狂歡派對吉隆坡站即將開啟,業務拓展與人脈社交從馬來西亞開始
灰度頭條
斯里蘭卡博弈產業大轉型,官方:劍指南亞拉斯維加斯
合規與政策
灰度在iGB L!VE 2026展位T70和你相約7月,一起點燃倫敦的熱情!
灰度頭條
亞洲遊戲市場觀察:15大市場熱門遊戲與用戶趨勢
網路遊戲
印度最高法院受理公益訴訟,要求全國禁封「偽裝」成社交遊戲的賭博平台
合規與政策
哈薩克計劃對線上賭場促銷活動進行處罰
合規與政策
新澤西州7月博彩收入創6.06億美元新高,頒布禁令
合規與政策
巴西擬將博弈稅率提高至24% 稅收將用於社保與醫療領域
合規與政策
越南在線博彩業政策收緊 催生市場新機遇
東南亞資訊
菲律賓網絡賭博和加密貨幣仍構成持續的洗錢風險
東南亞資訊
印第安納州在線賭場法案在眾議院委員會停滯不前
合規與政策
超級PAC籌資4800萬美元:體育博彩勢力加碼
合規與政策
橫跨全球6個城市,灰度8場派對邀你共看世界盃,重塑高質量社交新場景
灰度頭條
首頁
遊戲
合作
發現
我的