DOI Says U.S. Supreme Court Not Needed In Florida Betting Case
· 2024-05-14

DOI Says U.S. Supreme Court Not Needed In Florida Betting Case

The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) doesn’t believe the U.S. Supreme Court should be involved in the legal controversy surrounding Florida sports betting.

DOI’s 31-page filing was written by Department of Justice attorneys on behalf of the DOI in response to West Flager’s writ of certiorari request, and it emphasizes that recent court rulings allowing the state’s current sports betting system are correct.

The Seminole Tribe has a compact with the state, which allows it to hold a sports betting monopoly in the Sunshine State. Hard Rock Bet is the only betting app available in Florida.

West Flagler has argued that compact shouldn’t be allowed to exist, while the DOI disagrees. West Flagler is hopeful that the U.S. Supreme Court will take a look at the issue, while the DOI is aiming to prevent the case from reaching that level.

The DOI focuses on three questions in its 31-page response:

The response claims that the agreement does not violate any of those three, therefore it should remain in place and shouldn’t be heard by the Supreme Court.

The idea that tribes and states are largely allowed to negotiate on their own terms proved to be a major argument throughout the DOI’s response. The response also mentions that the DOI never actually signed the compact agreement, but rather let it go into effect without a signature.

“IGRA largely leaves the substance of a Tribal-State compact concerning gaming on Indian lands to be determined by the Tribe and the State that negotiate it,” the response says.

Additionally, the response leans heavily on the court of appeals decision allowing the compact to remain in place following a district court ruling in favor of West Flagler. The response mentions that the court of appeals didn’t view the compact in violation with the UIGEA.

DOI also leaned on the court of appeals ruling when discussing the Fifth Amendment question. DOI believes the matter relating to a tribal and state agreement belongs in state court, rather than the federal level.

It’s now up to the Supreme Court to determine if it wants to hear the case.

熱門文章
巴西擬將博弈稅率提高至24% 稅收將用於社保與醫療領域
合規與政策
斯里蘭卡博弈產業大轉型,官方:劍指南亞拉斯維加斯
合規與政策
菲律賓博彩技術賽道迎來新變局,B2B 供應模式加速滲透
東南亞資訊
越南博彩管控逐步放寬,惟本土需求仍顯乏力
東南亞資訊
印第安納州在線賭場法案在眾議院委員會停滯不前
合規與政策
灰度在iGB L!VE 2026展位T70和你相約7月,一起點燃倫敦的熱情!
灰度頭條
英國確認各垂直行業的賭博稅稅率
合規與政策
超級PAC籌資4800萬美元:體育博彩勢力加碼
合規與政策
西班牙監管機構警告在線賭博平臺存在身份盜竊行為
合規與政策
橫跨全球6個城市,灰度8場派對邀你共看世界盃,重塑高質量社交新場景
灰度頭條
JILI 宣佈與全球板球傳奇 AB de Villiers(ABD)達成重磅戰略合作
體育遊戲
新澤西州7月博彩收入創6.06億美元新高,頒布禁令
合規與政策
GGC Awards 2026 璀璨科倫坡:致敬 iGaming 行業的領航者與創新力量
灰度頭條
越南在線博彩業政策收緊 催生市場新機遇
東南亞資訊
印度最高法院受理公益訴訟,要求全國禁封「偽裝」成社交遊戲的賭博平台
合規與政策
首頁
遊戲
合作
發現
我的