Court upholds iGaming Ontario model, dismisses Kahnawà:ke…
Regulation · 2024-05-23

Court upholds iGaming Ontario model, dismisses Kahnawà:ke…

The Ontario Superior Court has dismissed the challenge filed by the Mohawk Council of Kahnawà:ke and ruled that the gaming model operated by iGaming Ontario is valid.

“We have always been confident in our model and are pleased that the court has ruled in our favour, and that Ontarians can continue to play with confidence in our regulated iGaming market,” said Executive Director of iGaming Ontario Martha Otton in an iGO statement. “Ontario’s model meets the requirements and contributes to the public good by protecting players, their data and their funds, while helping to fund priority public services in Ontario, and bringing well-paid, high-tech jobs and economic development to Ontario.”

iGaming Ontario has overseen online gaming and sports betting in Ontario since the province launched its regulated market on April 4, 2022.

The Superior Court’s ruling that iGO’s gaming model was valid was a direct response to a challenge lodged by Kahnawà:ke back in November 2022, seven months after the province launched regulated gaming, and heard from February of this year. The motion filed by the MCK argued that the provincial government’s “unilateral changes” to the way gaming is managed were “illegal and unconstitutional.”

The challenge hinged on the assertion that Ontario had re-interpreted Section 207 (1) of the Criminal Code, which permits provinces to regulate single-event sports betting, by allowing operators to “conduct and manage” themselves. Essentially, the MCK was asking the government to rule that it was the private-sector operators conducting and managing gaming offered in Ontario, not iGO.

The judgment noted there are issues with the phrase “conduct and manage” itself. Justice Lisa Brownstone wrote that she found the grammatical and ordinary sense of the terms “not particularly helpful to the interpretive task at hand” due to the vagaries of the ways the term can be defined.

Both parties had made their case.

The MCK said in its filing that “any reasonable interpretation” of the phrase “conduct and manage” would determine that Ontario leaves those duties up to the operators, who own their gaming websites, select their gaming offerings, decide how to advertise their products and services, and keep the lion’s share of the revenue. Meanwhile, iGO maintains that it conducts and manages iGaming, including controlling what games are allowed and how operators can operate, on behalf of the province via contracts with operators.

While the court ruled that Kahnawà:ke did have standing to challenge the province, it disagreed with the Council’s assertion. Justice Brownstone determined that the province has retained “key decision-making power” over the iGaming scheme and that operators in the Ontario market are not “their own masters.” Brownstone pointed to the fact that operators are not able to decide which games are eligible and are restricted in several avenues such as data usage, subcontracting, advertising, customer care, and responsible gaming.

On Monday, iGO said that “in dismissing the application brought forward by the Mohawk Council of Kahnawà:ke, the Superior Court found that iGaming Ontario is the ‘operating mind’ behind Ontario’s competitive iGaming market in accordance with the conduct and manage requirements of the Criminal Code.”

Kahnawà:ke had said its official legal challenge was a last resort after its attempts to engage in dialogue with government officials were repeatedly ignored.

The Council has been in the online gaming industry for 25 years, licensing online gaming operators on behalf of the Mohawks of Kahnawà:ke. It had been a vocal opponent of Bill C-218, the legislation that introduced single-event sports betting and ultimately led to Ontario’s regulated market opening up.

Kahnawà:ke said the bill “changed the iGaming/sports betting landscape to the detriment of Indigenous People” and that the subsequent framework for the market “disregards the expertise and the rights of First Nations to operate and regulate safe and responsible gaming.”

As a result of its opposition to Ontario’s new market, the MCK ceased the operations of its wholly owned subsidiary, Mohawk Online Limited, in the province.

熱門文章
菲律賓網絡賭博和加密貨幣仍構成持續的洗錢風險
東南亞資訊
斯里蘭卡博弈產業大轉型,官方:劍指南亞拉斯維加斯
合規與政策
巴西擬將博弈稅率提高至24% 稅收將用於社保與醫療領域
合規與政策
橫跨全球6個城市,灰度8場派對邀你共看世界盃,重塑高質量社交新場景
灰度頭條
英國確認各垂直行業的賭博稅稅率
合規與政策
灰度在iGB L!VE 2026展位T70和你相約7月,一起點燃倫敦的熱情!
灰度頭條
越南博彩管控逐步放寬,惟本土需求仍顯乏力
東南亞資訊
印度最高法院受理公益訴訟,要求全國禁封「偽裝」成社交遊戲的賭博平台
合規與政策
越南在線博彩業政策收緊 催生市場新機遇
東南亞資訊
超級PAC籌資4800萬美元:體育博彩勢力加碼
合規與政策
哈薩克計劃對線上賭場促銷活動進行處罰
合規與政策
西班牙監管機構警告在線賭博平臺存在身份盜竊行為
合規與政策
新澤西州7月博彩收入創6.06億美元新高,頒布禁令
合規與政策
印第安納州在線賭場法案在眾議院委員會停滯不前
合規與政策
JILI 宣佈與全球板球傳奇 AB de Villiers(ABD)達成重磅戰略合作
體育遊戲
首頁
遊戲
合作
發現
我的