The Impact of Affordability Checks on the Horseracing Industry
· 2023-10-26

The Impact of Affordability Checks on the Horseracing Industry

The Impact of Affordability Checks on the Horseracing Industry

Share This Tags

The horseracing industry in Britain is currently facing a significant threat due to proposed legislation that would impose strict affordability checks on bettors. These checks, outlined in the UK Government’s Gambling White Paper, aim to address problem gambling by subjecting individuals who lose as little as £1.37 a day to intrusive scrutiny. However, the racing industry argues that these measures would have a catastrophic impact on the sport and could result in significant financial losses.

The UK Government’s Gambling White Paper introduced the concept of two tiers of affordability checks. The first tier targets individuals who lose £125 in 30 days or £500 in a year. These bettors would undergo frictionless background checks using publicly available data. The second tier involves more detailed scrutiny for individuals with net losses of £1,000 within 24 hours or £2,000 in 90 days. These checks would require credit reference agencies to be involved, and bookmakers would also request personal documentation such as bank statements and proof of earnings.

The proposed blanket affordability checks have been met with significant opposition from various stakeholders in the horseracing industry. More than one in four bettors claim to have already undergone affordability checks by bookmakers in anticipation of their implementation. Some operators have even requested financial documentation, including payslips and P60 forms. Racing industry experts warn that enforcing these strict measures in their current form would have a devastating impact on the industry.

According to a survey conducted by the ‘Right to Bet’ campaign, over half of the 14,000 racing bettors who participated stated that they would either walk away from the sport completely or reduce their involvement if the proposed checks were implemented. This exodus could result in a significant loss of revenue for the industry, estimated at around £250 million over the next five years. Furthermore, the introduction of the checks has already led to a decline in online betting revenue.

In response to the consultation on ‘Financial risk checks for bettors’ conducted by the Gambling Commission, the horseracing industry has launched a petition urging the UK Government to abandon the planned implementation of the betting affordability checks. The petition, listed as “Stop the planned implementation of betting affordability or financial risk checks” on Change.org, highlights the industry’s concerns about the proposed checks’ intrusiveness and discriminatory nature.

The horseracing industry argues that the proposed checks represent a significant infringement on personal freedom. Nevin Truesdale, Chief Executive of The Jockey Club, emphasizes that it is deeply concerning that racing fans may have to prove they can afford to lose less than £10 a week on their hobby. This level of intrusiveness is not seen in any other aspect of society, and the industry believes it is unjustified given the low percentage of problem gambling in relation to horseracing.

The potential consequences of the proposed affordability checks extend beyond the horseracing industry itself. The industry, supporting over 85,000 jobs and contributing £4.1 billion to the UK economy annually, plays a crucial role in the communities it serves. If the checks were to be implemented, many livelihoods would be at risk. Trainers, breeders, farriers, vets, jockeys, and countless other individuals who depend on the industry for their income could face significant challenges. Additionally, the local businesses that thrive as a part of racing communities would also be put at risk.

One major concern raised by the horseracing industry is the effectiveness of the proposed checks in addressing problem gambling. While the industry acknowledges the need to help those with gambling issues, it argues that blanket affordability checks will not address the underlying problem. Betting is a habit-forming activity, and those who bet responsibly may be deterred or forced into the unregulated black market. Meanwhile, individuals who cannot afford to gamble may find alternative ways to do so.

Instead of blanket affordability checks, the horseracing industry advocates for a more targeted approach. Industry experts propose focusing on other markers of harm rather than solely relying on financial checks. By addressing the root causes of problem gambling and implementing measures that specifically target at-risk individuals, the industry believes a more effective solution can be found.

熱門文章
菲律賓網絡賭博和加密貨幣仍構成持續的洗錢風險
東南亞資訊
JILI 宣佈與全球板球傳奇 AB de Villiers(ABD)達成重磅戰略合作
體育遊戲
英國確認各垂直行業的賭博稅稅率
合規與政策
新澤西州7月博彩收入創6.06億美元新高,頒布禁令
合規與政策
印度最高法院受理公益訴訟,要求全國禁封「偽裝」成社交遊戲的賭博平台
合規與政策
印第安納州在線賭場法案在眾議院委員會停滯不前
合規與政策
越南在線博彩業政策收緊 催生市場新機遇
東南亞資訊
西班牙監管機構警告在線賭博平臺存在身份盜竊行為
合規與政策
橫跨全球6個城市,灰度8場派對邀你共看世界盃,重塑高質量社交新場景
灰度頭條
灰度在iGB L!VE 2026展位T70和你相約7月,一起點燃倫敦的熱情!
灰度頭條
越南博彩管控逐步放寬,惟本土需求仍顯乏力
東南亞資訊
超級PAC籌資4800萬美元:體育博彩勢力加碼
合規與政策
巴西擬將博弈稅率提高至24% 稅收將用於社保與醫療領域
合規與政策
哈薩克計劃對線上賭場促銷活動進行處罰
合規與政策
菲律賓博彩技術賽道迎來新變局,B2B 供應模式加速滲透
東南亞資訊
首頁
遊戲
合作
發現
我的